Canada’s commitment to protecting the persecuted is being challenged by serious allegations of organized immigration fraud. A Federal Court case has exposed a potential scheme involving a network of alleged fraudsters, some of whom are connected to Iran, who allegedly used fabricated evidence to manipulate the asylum process. This raises urgent concerns about the integrity of Canada’s immigration system and the need to safeguard genuine asylum seekers.
An investigation has uncovered a troubling pattern of deception, suggesting an organized effort to exploit Canada’s asylum system. The alleged scheme involves the use of falsified documents, staged events, and the creation of fake online narratives to support fraudulent asylum claims. This case, involving individuals connected to Parsi Canada, an immigration consultancy, highlights the vulnerability of the system and the need for stronger safeguards. It is crucial to emphasize that these are allegations against specific individuals, and not a reflection on any particular community or nationality.
At the center of the controversy is Mozhdeh Shekarisaz, the wife of Ahmad Ayoubi, a key figure associated with Parsi Canada. Shekarisaz has filed a judicial review application (Federal Court Case File: IMM-17694-24, and related files) challenging a decision by the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA). The core issue is the veracity of the claim that her husband, Ahmad Ayoubi, is a victim of political persecution—a claim now under intense scrutiny.
There is a growing concern that some individuals facing criminal charges or seeking to avoid legal consequences in Iran are fabricating stories of political persecution to bolster their asylum claims in Western countries. This alleged tactic involves the creation of false narratives, often supported by manipulated evidence or orchestrated online activity, designed to portray the applicant as a victim of the Iranian regime. By misrepresenting their situation, these individuals may attempt to exploit the asylum systems of nations that offer refuge to those genuinely fleeing political oppression, potentially undermining the process for legitimate cases and straining resources.
Federal Court Case Details:
- Applicant: Mozhdeh Shekarisaz
- Court: Federal Court of Canada (Ottawa Office)
- Decision Under Review: Issued by CBSA (Vancouver), dated September 9, 2024
- Status: Under judicial review
Evidence presented in the case has raised red flags, prompting concerns about potential systemic fraud and the involvement of organized crime.
Key Allegations of Immigration Fraud in Canada:
- Conflicting Official Records: A crucial revelation came on March 12, 2025, when cybercrime investigator Mohammad Jorjandi presented findings in a YouTube live stream. Analyzing data from the leaked Iranian judicial database Edaalat.org, Jorjandi demonstrated that Ahmad Ayoubi’s only official conviction in Iran was for smuggling alcoholic beverages in 2021. This directly contradicts claims of political persecution, arrest for dissent, or involvement in anti-regime activities. It also suggests that these individuals may be involved in criminal activity within Iran.
- Orchestrated Online Threats: Immediately following the exposure of the true legal record, a series of threatening online comments appeared, seemingly aimed at fabricating evidence of danger. These comments, posted from newly created accounts and including Ayoubi’s home address, were quickly deleted, raising strong suspicions of a coordinated attempt to manufacture “proof” of persecution.
- Manufactured Media Narrative: On March 15, 2025, a suspicious wave of nearly identical articles appeared on several websites. These articles falsely portrayed Ahmad Ayoubi as a political dissident who had been arrested and prosecuted for “propaganda against the Islamic Republic.” The timing, uniformity, and tone point to a deliberate effort to create fraudulent supporting documentation for the asylum application.
- Manipulation of Public Records: In a highly concerning development, Ahmad Ayoubi’s actual legal record reportedly vanished from the Iranian judiciary portal shortly after the appearance of the fake news reports. This removal of verifiable evidence allowed the fabricated media narrative to potentially become the primary source of information for the Federal Court’s review of the asylum claim.
- Strategic Public Relations Campaign: A seemingly calculated public relations campaign was launched, featuring an article titled “Engineer Ahmad Ayoubi – The Entrepreneurial Journey from Iran to Canada.” This campaign appears designed to create a dual identity, portraying the individual simultaneously as a successful entrepreneur in Canada and a persecuted individual deserving of refugee protection.
Impact on Canada’s Immigration System and Genuine Asylum Seekers:
These allegations raise serious questions about the vulnerability of Canada’s immigration system to sophisticated fraud. If substantiated, this case could have far-reaching consequences, potentially:
- Undermining the Credibility of Genuine Claims: It could erode public trust in the asylum system and make it more difficult for legitimate refugees, regardless of their origin, to receive protection.
- Encouraging Further Fraud: It could embolden others to attempt similar schemes, further straining the system and jeopardizing its resources.
- Damaging Canada’s Reputation: It could tarnish Canada’s image as a country that upholds humanitarian values in its immigration policies.
Call to Action:
To protect the integrity of Canada’s asylum system and ensure the safety of genuine refugees, the following actions are crucial:
- Rigorous Judicial Review: The Federal Court of Canada must conduct a thorough and impartial investigation into the veracity of all evidence presented, with heightened scrutiny of the media reports and online activity.
- Strengthened Verification Processes: Canadian immigration authorities (CBSA and Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC)) must implement more robust verification processes to detect and prevent fraudulent asylum claims, including enhanced scrutiny of politically based claims and digital evidence.
- Independent Oversight: Independent watchdogs, journalists, and civil society organizations must continue to play a vital role in monitoring the system and exposing potential abuses.
- Public Awareness: Increased public awareness about the issue of immigration fraud is essential to fostering support for measures that protect the system and those who genuinely need its protection. It is important to emphasize that this is a problem of criminal activity, not a reflection on any specific community.
Source: This article is based on an investigative report published by Webamooz.com on April 24, 2025. (https://www.webamooz.com/en/2025/04/24/fake-politics-real-fraud-deceiving-canadian-courts/)
